For any political leader, a reshuffling of the Cabinet is a
most delicate process, in which they must sensitively deal with the egos and
factional tensions within their party, whilst at the same time assembling a
team capable of forming a competent and united face of the Government. As a
former staffer in a Ministerial office, hours and hours, months and months were
spent speculating about where on the chess board our boss would be moved, and
what this meant for us. The only reshuffle I experienced was swift and
surgical, where only the select few knew the details before the plug was
pulled, leaving the rest us to crouch around the crackly Parliamentary radio,
straining our ears to hear our future. The current Jay Weatherill reshuffle
could be only described as being surgical in the MASH sense.
Matthew Abraham, today on twitter, described the use of the
resignation of Pat Conlon and John Hill as impetus to initiate a reshuffle as “clever
politics”. The departure of senior ministers who will not be contesting the
2014 election is indeed a worthy justification for reshuffling a Cabinet,
approximately 1 year out from the election. A joint media conference, held with
Conlon, Hill and Weatherill, announcing the resignations and the replacements would
have been superb politics. This is not what has happened, however.
The duo of resignations in the last 24 hours of Hill and
Conlon has been instigated by the leaking of a story to the News Limited press,
foreshadowing their departure from Cabinet. Whilst it is possible that this was
all part of a “cunning plan” to get the ball rolling, this makes no sense for
multiple reasons. Firstly, Weatherill is not ready to announce the shape and
make up of his new cabinet. Secondly, Conlon’s resignation press release was
dropped in the dead of night, after a day of speculation, whilst Hill’s was
dropped shortly after Jay had been on radio refusing to rule in or out whether
John was going. This is in stark contrast to the happy families press
conference in which Michael Wright and Paul Holloway bowed out from Cabinet.
Finally, Pat Conlon, along with much of the political media and staffers, is on
his annual leave. No, the story was leaked with hostility, and it has brought the
issue to a head well before intended.
There are two main possibilities for why the internal
machinations of the ALP have been leaked to the media. Firstly, it is possible
that somebody (either currently in Cabinet or someone wanting to be) has been
told they are not going to receive the outcome that they wanted, resulting in a
dummy spit leaking. The other possibility is that the woeful and angry
performance of Pat Conlon on the “hot busses” story, combined with the
heightening crisis in the health system prompted party tacticians to initiate
some political euthanasia. I think the first option is more likely, especially
given the breaking revelation that Jay Weatherill plans to arrange his Cabinet
based upon his own considerations, rather than those of the factions.
It is my fervent belief that one of the major reasons behind
Kevin Rudd’s downfall was his failure to appease the factions when it came to
Cabinet selection. I recall Don Farrell seething when Rudd dumped SA Right
darling Annette Hurley from Cabinet. Jay Weatherill is playing with fire if he
chooses to follow this path. Of the four ministers tipped to go, one is
unaligned, one is from the Right, whilst Conlon was a member of the Left, but
not anymore. A shrinking of the Cabinet by two spots means that there are two
new positions, and given the nature of those leaving, the Right would expect to
land at least one of those spots. Jay has a problem, however, caused by the
quality of the Ministers that are leaving.
John Hill and Pat Conlon have undoubtedly been two of the
shining stars of the Rann era, occupying the more difficult and senior
portfolios. Jay’s dilemma is he must either find someone within the existing
Cabinet to foist these portfolios onto, or he must find someone else outside of
Cabinet to give them to. His dilemma is that perhaps the two most capable
backbenchers are Dr Susan Close and Kyam Maher, both from the Left, and both
cleanskins without existing portfolios. If Jay were to appoint them to senior
positions, he would offend existing Ministers (Kenyon, Koutsantonis etc) who
would feel that they are ready for bigger tasks, people elected at same time as
Close (Bettison) whilst also offending the Right for ignoring their backbenchers.
With existing front benchers, John Rau and Jack Snelling have both been strong
media performers, but I guess that they would view any movement in portfolio as
a downward step. The media has speculated that Rau may get a super portfolio,
but again, this may offend some of the junior ministers hoping for more. Michael
O’Brien has taken his foot out of his mouth for an unprecedented period of
time, so it is possible that he can get a promotion too.
Mike Rann had the luxury of being a factional neutral,
whilst any unilateral decisions made by Jay will be seen as an act of factional
warfare. Selecting two Left wing backbenchers for promotion would be trouble,
and I will be surprised if he goes this route. He will probably say “I am
making my own decisions”, and then adhere to the factional ratio that is
required. Another dilemma stemming from his Left wing affiliation is what to do
with embattled Grace Portolesi. With the impending Debelle inquiry looming
overheard, Jay is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. He can dump Grace in
the reshuffle (he has stoutly defended her thus far), which would result in her
losing face OR retain her in the portfolio, and face the risk of a damning
report requiring her to stand down, triggering further reshuffling. A third
option is to promote her, which is the biggest risk of all given her failings
in a mid tier portfolio. This is all complicated, of course, by her factional
allegiance and also her history as Jay’s Chief of Staff.
Finally, Russell Wortley, tipped to be dumped on performance
grounds, would undoubtedly feel a little miffed if someone like Grace is not
also punished on performance grounds. They both have been hammered by the
media, for both travel expenditure and ministerial inadequacies. Some within
the Right may feel that it is one attitude towards the goose, whilst another
for the gander. If Jay missteps, it is very likely that his goose is cooked.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.